2012 BOXING fight – Juan Manuel Marquez vs Serhiy Fedchenko – full fight Video

Since we have been blocked on Facebook and Twitter, it's better you join us on Telegram!-)
Join Us on Telegram! AllTheBestFights.com button
If you can't watch a video due to geographic restrictions, get ExpressVPN clicking on this link, and you receive 3 extra months free (30 day money-back guarantee).

2_stars_boxing_ranking_allthebestfightsReview: 2012-04-14, the fight between Juan Manuel Marquez and Serhiy Fedchenko has not been very exciting: two stars (fight ended by unanimous decision). Juan Manuel Marquez (53-6-1) entered as the No.1 light welterweight in the world while Serhiy Fedchenko (30-1-0) entered as the No.25. Marquez vs Fedchenko is valid for the interim WBO light welterweight title. Watch the video!


 

Date: 2012-04-14

Where: New Mexico City Arena, Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico

Division: light welterweight (140 lbs, 63.5 kg)

Title: interim WBO light welterweight title

Result: Click here to show the fight’s result
Juan Manuel Marquez def. Serhiy Fedchenko (unanimous decision, 119-109, 118-110, 118-110)

 

Marquez’s previous fight: Manny Pacquiao vs Juan Manuel Marquez 3

Marquez’s next fight: Manny Pacquiao vs Juan Manuel Marquez 4

[php]
include(“banner.php”);
[/php]

Video:
Marquez vs Fedchenko part 1/3

Marquez vs Fedchenko part 2/3

Marquez vs Fedchenko part 3/3

Support AllTheBestFights.com! We believe in a free, open and decentralized internet.
donation crypto button AllTheBestFights.com or donation paypal button AllTheBestFights.com
Thanks to our donors of 2022: Merbin, Kevin, Gregory...

 

 

4 comments on “2012 BOXING fight – Juan Manuel Marquez vs Serhiy Fedchenko – full fight Video”

  1. fedchencko is terrible. i think Maruez should have been more agressive. there wasn’t much risk of being knocked out by fedchenko so just go for it.

    Reply
  2. fedchencko is terrible. i think Maruez should have been more agressive. there wasn’t much risk of being knocked out by fedchenko so just go for it.

    Reply

Leave a Comment